The Seven Millennium Prize Problems
Seven Millennium Prize Problems designated by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000, with a one-million-dollar prize allocated to each. More than two decades later, only the Poincaré Conjecture has been officially resolved.
Select a card to move the map to that location.
John Nash
A mathematician who formalized a state in which, given everyone else’s choices, no player can gain by changing strategy alone. Nash’s 1950 thesis proved that every finite noncooperative game has at least one equilibrium when mixed strategies are allowed; the finiteness and mixed-strategy hypotheses matter. His work also reached far beyond game theory, including the Nash embedding theorem and nonlinear partial differential equations. From 1959, schizophrenia and hospitalizations severely interrupted his research and life, and his symptoms eased gradually over many years. That experience should not be consumed as “thirty lost years,” a campus ghost, or a miraculous recovery owed to one person. In 1994 he shared the economics prize with Harsanyi and Selten for equilibrium analysis, and in 2015 shared the Abel Prize with Nirenberg for nonlinear PDE. He and his wife Alicia died in a traffic accident later that year.
Alexander Grothendieck
A mathematician who often changed the language surrounding a problem. After wartime internment and study in Montpellier, Paris, and Nancy, he worked with a broad network at IHÉS. Schemes, étale cohomology, and topoi reorganized questions across algebraic geometry and number theory; seminars, students, and collaborative redaction were essential to that programme.
Grigori Perelman
A Russian geometer whose three 2002–2003 arXiv preprints overcame central obstacles in Richard Hamilton’s Ricci-flow program. Detailed work by several teams established the proof of the Poincaré and geometrization conjectures. He declined the 2006 Fields Medal and the 2010 Clay prize; speculation about his present private life is neither verifiable nor needed to understand the mathematics.
EXPERT → RESEARCH FRONTIER
The expert stage ends with a better question.
Separate proved results from conjectures, inspect current evidence, and choose a boundary where your own inquiry can begin.
Next takeaway · One open question worth following
Explore open problems