All perspectives

1748–1779

Hume — Weighing miracle testimony and arguments from design

How strong must testimony be when weighed against the chance that the report is mistaken and the chance that a regularity of nature has failed?

Evidence-backed account

Enquiry X asks us to weigh evidence that testimony is false against evidence, grounded in experience, that a law of nature has been violated.

Open evidence

This is an evidence-linked editorial paraphrase, not a direct quotation.

  • Hume on Religion

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    Locator: §3 Miracles

    Open source

The Dialogues tests how little the analogy from worldly order to a designer can establish about the nature and number of its cause.

Open evidence

This is an evidence-linked editorial paraphrase, not a direct quotation.

  • Hume on Religion

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    Locator: §4 The Design Argument

    Open source
Return to the full question