All perspectives

Probably around 369 BCE

Plato — A dialogue that leaves the definition open

If knowledge is perception, true judgment, or true judgment with an account, why does the dialogue stop without settling on one?

Evidence-backed account

The Theaetetus successively tests candidates that identify knowledge with perception, true judgment, and true judgment with an account.

Open evidence

This is an evidence-linked editorial paraphrase, not a direct quotation.

  • Theaetetus

    Plato · Perseus Digital Library text with Stephanus pagination

    Locator: Stephanus 151d–187a, 187b–201c, 201d–210a

    Open source
  • Plato on Knowledge in the Theaetetus

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    Locator: Sections 6–8

    Open source

The dialogue ends in aporia without endorsing any of the three candidates as its final definition of knowledge.

Open evidence

This is an evidence-linked editorial paraphrase, not a direct quotation.

  • Theaetetus

    Plato · Perseus Digital Library text with Stephanus pagination

    Locator: Stephanus 210a–b

    Open source
  • Plato on Knowledge in the Theaetetus

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    Locator: Introduction and section 9

    Open source

The dialogue is commonly dated to around 369 BCE; no exact place of composition is asserted.

Open evidence

This is an evidence-linked editorial paraphrase, not a direct quotation.

  • Plato on Knowledge in the Theaetetus

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    Locator: Introduction, date and dramatic frame

    Open source
Return to the full question