All philosophy questions
Open inquiry12 min4 historical perspectives

Can we be responsible if we could not have done otherwise?

Use coercion, habit, prediction, and self-control to separate freedom as alternatives, sourcehood, acting on reasons, and self-understanding.

Your selections stay on this device and are not sent to the server or analytics.

There is no score or philosophy profile. Compare reasons rather than labels.

Enter the historical conversation.

Different views show the same evidence-backed material. The map does not replace events whose location is unknown.

  1. 1First to second century CEEpictetus — What is up to us is judgment and volition

    Epictetus · Discourses and Encheiridion

    Can we be free by governing assent to impressions even when external events are not ours to choose?

    Epictetus centers personal freedom on prohairesis, the capacity for volition, and the correct use of impressions.

    Source and exact locator

    The text is a Korean-English summary of the source, not a direct quotation.

    • Epictetus

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Introduction; §4.2 Prohairesis

      Open source

    His three areas of training include impulses to act, desire, and assent disciplined against deception and hasty judgment.

    Source and exact locator

    The text is a Korean-English summary of the source, not a direct quotation.

    • Epictetus

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: §4.1 The Three Areas of Study

      Open source
    1. Arrian's records of Epictetus' teaching preserve a discipline of volition and freedom.

      Early second century

  2. 21677Spinoza — Freedom through understanding, not an uncaused will

    Baruch Spinoza · Ethics

    If every action has causes, can understanding those causes make us freer?

    For Spinoza, a human mental action is not free in the sense of being determined by an undetermined faculty of will.

    Source and exact locator

    The text is a Korean-English summary of the source, not a direct quotation.

    • Spinoza's Psychological Theory

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Introduction; Ethics IIp48

      Open source

    Yet he allows degrees of freedom insofar as action follows from one’s nature and adequate understanding rather than external interference.

    Source and exact locator

    The text is a Korean-English summary of the source, not a direct quotation.

    • Spinoza's Psychological Theory

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Introduction; §3 Human Freedom

      Open source
    1. The posthumous Ethics explains necessity and human freedom within one nature.

      1677 · Amsterdam · 출판

  3. 31748Hume — Liberty compatible with necessity

    David Hume · Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, Section VIII

    Does the regular dependence of action on character and desire erase responsibility, or make it possible?

    Hume offers one of the most influential statements of classical compatibilism, reconciling freedom and moral responsibility with causal determination.

    Source and exact locator

    The text is a Korean-English summary of the source, not a direct quotation.

    • Hume on Free Will

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Introduction; §1 Liberty and Necessity — The Classical Reading

      Open source

    On this reading, a free action is not uncaused; it issues from the agent's desires and will and contrasts with action produced by constraint.

    Source and exact locator

    The text is a Korean-English summary of the source, not a direct quotation.

    • Hume on Free Will

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: §1 The Classical Reading; Treatise 2.3.2 and Enquiry 8

      Open source
    1. Section VIII of the Enquiry presents a public argument reconciling liberty and necessity.

      1748

  4. 41969Frankfurt — Acting for one’s own reasons without alternatives

    Harry Frankfurt · Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility

    If an intervener could block every alternative but never touches the actual decision, does the absence of alternatives remove responsibility?

    The Principle of Alternative Possibilities says a person is morally responsible only if they could have done otherwise.

    Source and exact locator

    The text is a Korean-English summary of the source, not a direct quotation.

    • Moral Responsibility and the Principle of Alternative Possibilities

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Introduction; Principle of Alternative Possibilities

      Open source

    Frankfurt-style cases argue for responsibility without alternatives, but objections continue over residual flickers of freedom and whether the cases presuppose determinism.

    Source and exact locator

    The text is a Korean-English summary of the source, not a direct quotation.

    • Moral Responsibility and the Principle of Alternative Possibilities

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: §3.4.3 Frankfurt-Style Cases; §4 Objections

      Open source
    1. Frankfurt's article shifts attention from alternative possibilities to the actual source of action.

      1969