What do we owe future people and the more-than-human world?
Use delayed ecological damage, choices that change who will exist, and low-probability technological catastrophe to compare moral community, time, identity, and responsibility.
Your selections stay on this device and are not sent to the server or analytics.
There is no score or philosophy profile. Compare reasons rather than labels.
Enter the historical conversation.
Different views show the same evidence-backed material. The map does not replace events whose location is unknown.
1949
The posthumous A Sand County Almanac recasts humans as members, not conquerors, of the land community.
Leopold — From conqueror to member of the land community
1979
The Imperative of Responsibility extends technological ethics to future people and planetary conditions.
Jonas — Greater power of action expands responsibility for the future
1984
Published in Oxford, Reasons and Persons makes future identity and population ethics central philosophical problems.
Parfit — Can we harm future people whose existence depends on our choice?
Oxford · 출판
1993
Feminism and the Mastery of Nature analyzes ecological destruction through conceptual structures linked to gendered, embodied, and colonial domination.
Plumwood — Human/nature dualism and the logic of domination