한
All philosophy questions
Open inquiry12 min4 historical perspectives

What makes power legitimate and rules fair?

Judge three cases involving safety, equal allocation, and official objection, then compare distinct scopes of justification in Mohism, Mencius, Xunzi, and Rawls.

Your actual judgments about authority and fairness stay on this device and are not shared or transmitted.

This voyage creates neither a score nor a political profile.

Enter the historical conversation.

Different views show the same evidence-backed material. The map does not replace events whose location is unknown.

  1. 1Mohist texts, 5th–3rd century BCEMozi and the Mohists — Public standards, inclusive care, and office

    Mozi and the Mohists · Mozi

    Can a standard checkable by all restrain a ruler's arbitrariness, or can it also suppress disagreement?

    The received Mozi is a multilayered compilation of anonymous material from roughly the fifth to third centuries BCE, not a finished book securely attributable to Mozi alone.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mozi

      Transmitted Mohist corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: Chapter structure

      Open source

    • Mohism

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 1

      Open source

    Mohist fa are connected with the search for public models or standards by which conduct and rule can be checked, rather than relying on custom or rank alone.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mozi

      Transmitted Mohist corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: Book 4

      Open source

    • Mohism

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 3

      Open source

    Inclusive care and benefit-harm standards support arguments that excluding persons, families, or states from moral concern generates conflict and harm.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mozi

      Transmitted Mohist corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: Books 14–16

      Open source

    • Mohism

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 7

      Open source

    Promoting the worthy calls for office to consider moral and practical qualifications beyond kinship and for officials to exemplify consistent standards.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mozi

      Transmitted Mohist corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: Books 8–10

      Open source

    • Mohism

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 6

      Open source

    The Mohist discussion of upward conformity joins unified standards with hierarchical teaching, reward, and punishment, exposing a tension between constraining arbitrariness and centralizing authority.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mozi

      Transmitted Mohist corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: Books 11–13

      Open source

    • Mohism

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 6

      Open source

    Mohist social benefit includes material sufficiency, population, order, and reduced violence, but it should not be reduced to a single modern utility score.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mohism

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Sections 2 and 7

      Open source

    • Social and Political Thought in Chinese Philosophy

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 2.2

      Open source

    1. The Mozi is a Mohist compilation with multiple periods and voices; no single composition city is inferred.

      Approximately 5th–3rd century BCE

  2. 24th century BCEMencius — Humane rule, people's lives, and forfeited status

    Mencius · Mengzi

    If a ruler destroys people's livelihood and trust, can the same obedience still be demanded?

    The received Mengzi transmits dialogues, arguments, and sayings, and its presentation must preserve the possibility of compilation by disciples or later followers.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mengzi

      Transmitted Mencian tradition; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: Received seven-book structure

      Open source

    • Mencius

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 1

      Open source

    Mengzi 1A1 and 1A7 present arguments that rule should attend to people's livelihood and humane concern rather than narrow calculations of advantage.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mengzi

      Transmitted Mencian tradition; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: 1A1 and 1A7

      Open source

    • Social and Political Thought in Chinese Philosophy

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 2.3

      Open source

    Mengzi 4B16 distinguishes subduing people by goodness from nurturing them through goodness and rejects an account of support grounded in force alone.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mengzi

      Transmitted Mencian tradition; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: 4B16

      Open source

    • Social and Political Thought in Chinese Philosophy

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 2.3

      Open source

    Mengzi 1B8 redescribes the killing of an extreme tyrant not simply as regicide but as punishment of someone who had forfeited normative ruler status.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mengzi

      Transmitted Mencian tradition; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: 1B8

      Open source

    • Social and Political Thought in Chinese Philosophy

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 1

      Open source

    The ordering of people, altars, and ruler in 7B14 strongly emphasizes the people, but it does not directly establish modern popular sovereignty or universal suffrage.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mengzi

      Transmitted Mencian tradition; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: 7B14

      Open source

    • Mencius

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 4

      Open source

    The criticism of Mozi in 3B9 records a real polemic over differentiated and inclusive care, but it must not be treated as a neutral summary of Mohism.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Mengzi

      Transmitted Mencian tradition; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with James Legge historical English translation

      Locator: 3B9

      Open source

    • Mencius

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 4

      Open source

    1. The Mengzi is a transmitted text arguing about rule, livelihood, trust, and ruler status; no composition city is inferred.

      Approximately 4th century BCE

    2. The current institutional record at Zoucheng documents reception and commemoration of Mencius, not the composition place of the Mengzi.

      Current reception context documented in 2025

  3. 3Xunzi, 3rd century BCE; later compilationXunzi — Ritual distinctions, standards, and human judgment

    Xunzi · Xunzi

    Do clear standards create a fair order by themselves, or does who applies them and how also matter?

    The received Xunzi depends on Liu Xiang's later compilation; it broadly represents Xunzi's thought but its present chapter order cannot be securely treated as Xunzi's own approved arrangement.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Xunzi

      Transmitted Xunzian corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with historical English translation

      Locator: Chapter structure

      Open source

    • Xunzi

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 1

      Open source

    Chapter 19 explains that unlimited desire and competition can produce conflict and poverty, so former kings established ritual and rightness to make distinctions and cultivate satisfaction.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Xunzi

      Transmitted Xunzian corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with historical English translation

      Locator: Chapter 19

      Open source

    • Xunzi

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 3

      Open source

    For Xunzi, ritual distinctions are not mere etiquette; they are educational and institutional practices that shape desire, roles, resources, emotion, and social order.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Xunzi

      Transmitted Xunzian corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with historical English translation

      Locator: Chapters 10 and 19

      Open source

    • Xunzi

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Sections 3–4

      Open source

    Chapter 12 marks the limit that standards do not create order by themselves; skilled human interpretation and judgment are needed to apply them.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Xunzi

      Transmitted Xunzian corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with historical English translation

      Locator: Chapter 12

      Open source

    • Social and Political Thought in Chinese Philosophy

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 2.8

      Open source

    Xunzi criticizes Mohist attention to music's material cost for missing moral and psychological functions, without rejecting common benefit or practical concerns altogether.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Xunzi

      Transmitted Xunzian corpus; Chinese Text Project · Classical Chinese text with historical English translation

      Locator: Chapters 20–21

      Open source

    • Xunzi

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 3

      Open source

    Xunzi's political order includes hierarchy, education, ritual, and coercion, so it cannot be presented as identical to modern neutral rule of law or equal citizenship.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Xunzi

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Sections 3–4

      Open source

    • Social and Political Thought in Chinese Philosophy

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 2.8

      Open source

    1. Warring States arguments in the Xunzi and Liu Xiang's later compilation are not merged into one composition-city event.

      Arguments around the 3rd century BCE; later compilation

  4. 41958 and 1971, twentieth centuryJohn Rawls — Fair terms of cooperation and the basic structure

    John Rawls · Justice as Fairness · A Theory of Justice

    If I did not know my social position, which rules for liberty, opportunity, and inequality could I accept?

    Rawls published 'Justice as Fairness' in 1958 and developed a systematic account for the basic structure of a liberal society in A Theory of Justice in 1971.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • Justice as Fairness

      John Rawls · 1958 · The Philosophical Review 67(2), 164–194; DOI 10.2307/2182612

      Locator: Volume 67(2), 164–194

      Open source

    • A Theory of Justice

      John Rawls · 1971 · Original edition: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; revised-edition structure via JSTOR

      Locator: Original edition, 1971

      Open source

    • John Rawls

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 4.1

      Open source

    The original position is not a historical contract but a hypothetical procedure modeling a standpoint for choosing fair terms of cooperation among free and equal citizens.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • A Theory of Justice

      John Rawls · 1971 · Original edition: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; revised-edition structure via JSTOR

      Locator: Sections 3–4 and 24

      Open source

    • Original Position

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Sections 1–3

      Open source

    The veil of ignorance limits information so parties cannot exploit their class, talents, convictions, or social position to choose principles biased in their own favor.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • A Theory of Justice

      John Rawls · 1971 · Original edition: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; revised-edition structure via JSTOR

      Locator: Section 24

      Open source

    • Original Position

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Sections 2–3

      Open source

    The first principle requires equal basic liberties compatible for all and gives them priority against simple tradeoffs for social or economic gains.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • A Theory of Justice

      John Rawls · 1971 · Original edition: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; revised-edition structure via JSTOR

      Locator: Sections 11 and 32–39

      Open source

    • John Rawls

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 4.3

      Open source

    The second principle distinguishes fair opportunity from inequalities arranged to benefit the least advantaged; it does not require identical outcomes.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • A Theory of Justice

      John Rawls · 1971 · Original edition: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; revised-edition structure via JSTOR

      Locator: Sections 12–17 and 46

      Open source

    • John Rawls

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Section 4.3

      Open source

    Rawls's central subject is the basic structure formed by major institutions such as constitutional, legal, economic, and family arrangements, not one formula for every personal action.

    You can inspect primary, archival, and scholarly evidence for each claim.

    Classical Chinese terms, Korean and English explanations, and Rawls's edition-specific formulations are kept distinct; no direct quotation is used.

    • John Rawls

      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

      Locator: Sections 4.1–4.3

      Open source

    1. The article 'Justice as Fairness' appears in a scholarly journal; its bibliographic record does not establish a writing or presentation city.

      1958

    2. Rawls begins research and teaching in Harvard's Philosophy Department; the activity site does not validate the theory itself.

      1962–1991 · Cambridge, MA · 주요활동

    3. The first edition of A Theory of Justice is published by Belknap Press in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

      1971 · Cambridge, MA · 출판