All perspectives

1969

Frankfurt — Acting for one’s own reasons without alternatives

If an intervener could block every alternative but never touches the actual decision, does the absence of alternatives remove responsibility?

Evidence-backed account

The Principle of Alternative Possibilities says a person is morally responsible only if they could have done otherwise.

Open evidence

This is an evidence-linked editorial paraphrase, not a direct quotation.

  • Moral Responsibility and the Principle of Alternative Possibilities

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    Locator: Introduction; Principle of Alternative Possibilities

    Open source

Frankfurt-style cases argue for responsibility without alternatives, but objections continue over residual flickers of freedom and whether the cases presuppose determinism.

Open evidence

This is an evidence-linked editorial paraphrase, not a direct quotation.

  • Moral Responsibility and the Principle of Alternative Possibilities

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    Locator: §3.4.3 Frankfurt-Style Cases; §4 Objections

    Open source
Return to the full question