One great problem, three kinds of immersion

From a story to your own conjecture

Problem stories open curiosity. The problem workshop is the next place, where curiosity becomes a testable idea.

  1. 1 · DiscoverMeet the questionLearn when it appeared and why it still holds people’s attention.
  2. 2 · ChallengeTest one caseMake your first observation in five minutes with a drawing, calculation, or colors.
  3. 3 · DevelopYou are hereBuild on ideasPublish an observation and grow it through comparisons, conjectures, and counterexamples.
Week 25 · ErdősPartial progress
Primary source

Erdős Unit Distance — How Many Unit-Distance Pairs Among nn Points?

Research level· Posed 1946

Problem

For nn points in the plane, what is the maximum number u(n)u(n) of pairs at exactly unit distance? Erdős (1946) showed u(n)n1+c/loglognu(n) \ge n^{1 + c/\log\log n} via grid analysis and conjectured the upper bound matches. For 80 years the integer grid was believed to be essentially optimal.

Why it matters

A sister of the distinct-distances problem (both posed in the same 1946 Erdős paper). The integer grid was believed to be essentially optimal for 80 years, with the best general upper bound O(n4/3)O(n^{4/3}) (Spencer–Szemerédi–Trotter, 1984). On 2026-05-20 OpenAI announced that an internal general-purpose reasoning model had automatically derived a counterexample refuting the grid-optimal intuition, verified by external mathematicians.

Progress so far

Lower bound: Erdős 1946 (n1+c/loglognn^{1 + c/\log\log n}, via grid + Gaussian-integer prime factorizations). Upper bound: Spencer–Szemerédi–Trotter 1984 (O(n4/3)O(n^{4/3})). On 2026-05-20 OpenAI announced an automatically-derived counterexample to the grid-optimal intuition, verified externally with algebraic number theory tools. The main upper-bound conjecture itself remains open — only the methodological landscape has changed.

Further reading

💡 Explore together, one line at a time(0 contributions)

Contributions are not ranked by popularity. Curator feedback names what is clear or reproducible, and peer signals mean someone understood or actually reproduced it.

What did you notice?

You do not need a complete proof. A small observation can open the next path.

Markdown + KaTeX supported (`$x^2$` inline, `$$\sum_{k=1}^n k$$` display)
0 / 3000 characters

moderation policy. Sign in after submitting if you want to edit or delete this attempt from another device.

Loading…

Related concepts

Related mathematicians